The Detector

Status Report 1993

Full, scanned version of the Status Report.

• Introduction
• Overview of the Detector
• Magnet System for the ZEUS Detector
• The Iron Yoke
• High Resolution Calorimeter
• Hadron Electron Separator
• Backing Calorimeter
• Charged Particle Detection
• Forward Muon Detector
• Barrel and Rear Muon Detector
• Veto Wall
• Measurement of Luminosity and Tagging of Small Angle Photons and Electrons
• Leading Proton Spectrometer
• Interaction Region and Background
• Trigger
• Data Acquisition
• Event Reconstruction and Analysis
• Summary of the Performance Characteristics of ZEUS
• Infrastructure
• Safety at ZEUS
• Construction Schedule
• Services Requested from DESY
• Cost and Responsibilities
• Composition of the Collaboration
• Acknowledgements
• The Electron-Proton Collider HERA

ZEUS Collaboration

Manitoba, McGill, Toronto, York
Canada

Bonn, DESY, DESY-Zeuthen, Freiburg,
Hamburg(I), Hamburg(II), Jülich, Siegen
Germany

Tel-Aviv, Weizmann Institute
Israel

Bologna, Cosenza, Florence, Frascati,
Padua, Rome, Turin(I), Turin(II)
Italy

Tokyo-INS, Tokyo-Metropolitan
Japan

Seoul
Korea

NIKHEF-Amsterdam
The Netherlands

Cracow, Warsaw
Poland

Moscow
Russia

Madrid
Spain

Bristol, Glasgow, London(IC), London(UC),
Oxford, Rutherford
United Kingdom

Argonne, Brookhaven, Columbia, Iowa, Luisiana, Ohio State,
Pennsylvania State, Santa Cruz, Virginia Tech, Wisconsin
USA

Editor Uwe Holm

February 1993

HTML Edition Wojtek Bogusz (LaTeX2HTML by Nicos Drakos)

But the mind of man is not, like Fourier's heated body, continually settling down into an ultimate state of quiet uniformity, the character of which we can already predict; it is rather like a tree, shooting out branches which adapt themselves to the new aspects of the sky towards which they climb, and roots which contort themselves among the strange strata of the earth into which they delve. To us who breathe only the spirit of our own age, and know only the characteristics of contemporary thought, it is as impossible to predict the general tone of the science of the future as it is anticipate the particular discoveries which it will make.

Physical research is continually revealing to us new features of natural processes, and we are thus compelled to search for new forms of thought appropriate to these features. Hence the importance of a careful study of these relations between Mathematics and Physics which determine the conditions under which the ideas derived from one department of physics may be safely used in forming ideas to be employed in a new department.

J. C. M. (1870)